Legal Opinion
United Scenic Artists, Local 829, Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 24, 1985No. 83-2135PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.
This case is before the Court for a second time on review from a decision of the National Labor Relations Board (the Board or NLRB) that the United Scenic Artists Local 829 of the Brotherhood of Painter and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO (Local 829) violated section 8(b)(4)(ii)(B) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(4)(ii)(B), the “secondary boycott” provision. 1 In the first review proceeding, this Court, in an opinion authored by Judge Tamm, reversed the Board’s decision and remanded, holding that the agency decision could be sustained only on…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Vlandis v. KlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Shi Liang Lin v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Mark Hagans v. Commissioner Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- United States v. McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- Usx Corporation and U.S. Steel Mining Company, Inc. v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- News America Publishing, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, the Committee for Media Diversity, Wilbert A. Tatum, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.