Berrien v. McLane
New York Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The Assistant Vice-Chancellor :
The bill is against the trustees of the Apalachicola Land Company, and against the cestuis que trust for the purpose of enforcing two agreements alleged to have been made by their lawful agent, one for the transfer of $13,500 acres of land, and another of 640 acres.
The trustees deny the validity of the claims, averring that whatever agreement may have been made by Peter Mitchell, with Thomas Vermilya, or with the complainant, it was not made by him as the authorized agent of the Company. These trustees have issued certificates or scrip to numerous individuals,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brisban v. BoydNew York Court of Chancery · 1832
- In re BleakleyNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stearns v. FelkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Manning v. HaydenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1879
- Stanton v. HaskinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1874