Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1988No. 163A88Published

1Opinion of the Court

373 S.E.2d 435 (1988)

323 N.C. 439

STATE of North Carolina

v.

Ernest Eugene SMITH, III.

STATE of North Carolina

v.

David Michael SCHOCH.

No. 163A88.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 1988.

Lacy H. Thornburg, Atty. Gen. by Thomas J. Ziko, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for State.

James, McElroy & Diehl, P.A. by Edward T. Hinson, Jr., Charlotte, for defendant-appellant Smith.

Ferguson, Stein, Watt, Wallas, and Adkin, P.A. by John W. Gresham, Charlotte, for defendant-appellant Schoch.

FRYE, Justice.

The dispositive issue presented on this appeal is whether the Court of Appeals erred when it affirmed the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Court v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. HagemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. City of Madison v. NickelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API