Legal Opinion

Powell v. O.R. "Bud" Daily

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1986No. 85-81PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Justice.

This case is presented to us through the certification of a constitutional issue from the District Court of the First Judicial District in Wyoming. The question presented is whether § 23 — 2—402(a)(iii), W.S.1977, violates the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the United States Constitution. Because the challenged statute burdens a fundamental right, and because the degree of discrimination does not bear a close relation to any of the State’s asserted reasons for the discriminatory treatment, we hold that § 23 — 2—402(a)(iii) impermissibly infringes upon the privileges and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Kleppe v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Supreme Court of NH v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United Building & Constr. Trades Council of Camden Cty. v. Mayor and Council of CamdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. O'BRIEN v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Frank v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Board of Dental ExaminersWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. ShunnesonWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. O'BRIEN v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API