Ryals v. City of Philadelphia
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge COHN.
The issue before us is which governmental body, the City of Philadelphia (City) or the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (DOT), bears responsibility for maintaining a crosswalk, formed by interlocking precast concrete pavers (“z-bricks”) and concrete headers, that crosses a City street that has been adopted as a State highway. The resolution of that question is, in turn, governed by whether the concrete headers and z-bricks that form the crosswalk are legally determined to be simply part of the surface of the “highway” or considered to be part of a “traffic…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Walker v. ElebySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Slough v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Williams v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Glenn v. HoranCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Slough v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harris v. Philadelphia Facilities Management Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Irey v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- S. Hoover v. S.A. Stine, PennDOT and the Borough of WaynesboroCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- J.L. Camacho v. West Chester Area SDCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017