Legal Opinion
Kinkead v. Lysol Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 24, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs. (See Karr v. Inecto, Inc., 247 N. Y. 360; Antowill v. Friedmann, 197 App. Div. 230; Willson v. Faxon, Williams & Faxon, 138 id. 359.) All concur, except Thompson, J., not voting. (The judgment dismisses plaintiff’s complaint in an action for damages for loss of services and care of plaintiff’s wife injured by use of a disinfectant.) Present — Sears, P. J., Thompson, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Karr v. Inecto, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Antowill v. FriedmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kaempfe v. Lehn & Fink Products Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Singer v. OkenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1949