Legal Opinion

In re WORTH LIGHTING & FIXTURE CO., Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 13, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEARNED HAND, District Judge.

The business of the claimant did not include, certainly in this instance, “discounting bills, notes or other evidences of debt.” The accounts for goods sold, which the bankrupt assigned to it, were not “evidences of debt.” They were dioses in action arising from sales of goods contained on the books of *773the bankrupt. What the statute means is commercial paper, which may-pass from one to another, bearing the signature of the debtor. The bankrupt had none such, and assigned none such. Besides, it did not discount the accounts. Discounting is getting the present value…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Bernard & KatzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. Antipyros Co. v. Samuel Breiter & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Silver Sands v. Pensacola Loan & Savings BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Rosen v. GarstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  5. Knowles v. RitterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API