Knowles v. Ritter
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
The trustee’s first contention is that the assignments were invalid to the extent of $5,500, because there was no “present consideration” therefor, within the meaning of section 67d of the Bankruptcy Act (11 USCA § 107(d). It was the practice of the parties, in computing the amount to be advanced upon the accounts assigned as collateral for such advance, to appraise the accounts at 92 per cent, of their face and to advance 80 per cent, of such appraised valua The accounts were thus appraised because the bankrupt’s customers were entitled…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Benedict v. RatnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Dean v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Security Mortgage Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Pacific State Bank v. CoatsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
- R. B. Company, Inc., and Nu Plastics, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Bernard & KatzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930