Legal Opinion

Perry v. Blatch

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 14, 1896No. 87PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Memorandum. — Error from Clay district court; R. B. Spilman, judge. Action of garnishment by Thomas Perry against C. F. Buckell and another. Judgment for W. F. Blatch, interpleader. Plaintiff brings the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garver, J. :

In an action commenced in the district court of Clay county by Thomas Perry, the plaintiff in error, against Anna T. Buckell, one William Stacy was summoned as garnishee. Stacy answered, and paid into the court the sum of $126, which he admitted he was owing under a contract made between him and the defendant, Buckell. Afterward,the. defendant in error, W. F. Blatch, filed an inter-plea in the case, claiming that the money was owing to him instead of to Mrs. Buckell. Upon issues joined between Perry and Blatch, the court adjudged the money…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fogleman v. ShivelyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Trickett v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  3. Miller v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1823
  4. Whitney v. MunroeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. GilmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Swofford Bros. Dry-goods Co. v. John S. Brittain Dry-goods Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API