Legal Opinion

Miller v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 15, 1823PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL the froj.p St. Louis Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Pettibone, J.,

delivered, the opinion of the Court.

J^his action was commenced hy attachment, and Wm. G. Pettus summoned as garnishee. At the second term interrogatories to the garnishee were filed, which were answered in substance as follo.ws: that Pettus, the garnishee, on the 9th May, 1820, made his note, payable in twelve months, to Richardson and one John A. Smith, for $1180 j that, in the month of August following, he paid to Richardson $84, and took his receipt, executed in the name of Richardspn and Smith ; that on the 18th May, 1821, a judgment was entered against Pettus, in favor of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bayha v. PhilipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  2. State ex rel. Knisely v. HoltcampSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  3. State ex rel. Snow Steam Pump Works v. HomerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  4. Moore v. GilmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Perry v. BlatchCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API