(PS) Wilkinson v. El Dorado Co Health and Humans Services Agency
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KELLY G. WILKINSON, No. 2:24-cv-01742-TLN-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 EL DORADO COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action. This matter was accordingly referred to the 19 undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has filed a request for leave to proceed 20 in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and has submitted the required declaration. See 28 U.S.C. 21 § 1915(a)(1). The motion to proceed IFP will therefore be granted.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.