Krumin v. Bruknes
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely
delivered the opinion of the court.
Plaintiff brought suit seeking damages for an alleged libel and upon trial had a verdict and judgment of $500. Defendant appeals, claiming that the alleged libelous documents were confidential communications absolutely privileged.
Plaintiff is the brother-in-law of defendant, defendant’s wife being plaintiff’s sister. Plaintiff was an automobile mechanic and defendant a butcher clerk, but in 1921 they formed what was called the S ahitaras Drug and Chemical Company and operated a drug store, employing a registered pharmacist.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boske v. ComingoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Totten v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Vogel v. GruazSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Worthington v. ScribnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Behrensmeyer v. KreitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- American Pet Motels, Inc. v. Chicago Veterinary Medical Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Judge v. Rockford Memorial HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
- Cook v. East Shore Newspapers, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1945
- Parker v. KirklandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
- Thomas v. PetrulisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.