Legal Opinion
Six Companies of California v. Joint Highway Dist. No. 13
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 8, 1938No. 20101-RPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROCHE, District Judge.
This is an action for damages for breach of contract. It is submitted to the *347court in the form of a cross-complaint, brought by the Joint Highway District No. 13, a public corporation of the state of California, hereafter called the District, against the Six Companies of California, a Nevada Corporation, licensed as a contractor in the State of California, and numerous foreign corporations, sureties on the Six Companies’ bond. Hereafter the Six Companies will also be referred to as the Contractor.
On July 1, 1936, litigation was begun by the Six Companies, which sought to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Wise v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Pacific Factor Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Robinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Hanlon Drydock & Shipbuilding Co. v. G. W. McNear, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Silva & Hill Construction Co. v. Employers Mutual Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Clemente Construction Corp. v. P. T. Cox Contracting Co.New York Supreme Court · 1939
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982