Legal Opinion

GTE Sylvania v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1983No. Appeal, No. 2987 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhaid,

G-.T.E. Sylvania (Employer) appeals here from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of a referee and held that John A. Lydon1 (Claimant) was totally disabled as a result of a work related back injury and therefore eligible for disability benefits. We affirm.

The case involves the occurrence of a nonwork injury between the date of Claimant’s work-related injury and the onset of Claimant’s disability. To be eligible for workmen’s compensation benefits2 a claimant must prove that his injury arose in the course of his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Halaski v. Hilton HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Gower v. MACKESSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Smith v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Panaci v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Friel v. Sun Shipbuilding & Drydock Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Warpinski v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Budd Trailer Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Volterano v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Matlack, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Bush Coal Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API