Legal Opinion
The Federal Labor Relations Authority v. Department of the Navy, Naval Resale Activity, Naval Air Station-Memphis Millington, Tennessee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 29, 1992No. 91-3450, 91-3510PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*125ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.
This matter is before us on an application for enforcement of an order of the Federal Labor Relations Authority filed by that agency, and a petition for review of that order, filed by the Department of the Navy.
The FLRA’s order in Case No. 4-CA-90632, reported at 40 F.L.R.A. (No. 70) 881 (1991), required the Navy to honor the request of a government employees’ union to furnish it, as exclusive representative of certain of the Navy’s employees, the names and home addresses of all employees in the bargaining unit represented by the union.
Resolving the question of…
2Cited by14 opinions
- United States Department of the Navy, Navy Exchange, Naval Training Station, Naval Hospital, Great Lakes, Illinois v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, Federal Labor Relations Authority v. United States Department of the Navy, Navy Exchange, Naval Training Station, Naval Hospital, Great Lakes, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Federal Labor Relations Authority v. U.S. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Federal Labor Relations Authority, in 90-3690 v. U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy Ships Parts Control Center, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy Fleet Material Support Office, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navsea Logistics Center, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy Publishing and Printing Service, American Federation of Government Employees, Intervenor. U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy Ships Parts Control Center, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy Fleet Material Support Office, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navsea Logistics Center, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy Publishing and Printing Service, in 90-3724 v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Federal Labor Relations Authority v. U.S. Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Federal Labor Relations Authority, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. United States Department of Defense, Army and Air Force Exchange Service, Dallas, Texas United States Department of Defense, Army and Air Force Exchange Service, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, Respondents/cross-Petitioners, American Federation of Government Employees (Afge), Intervenor, National Treasury Employees Union, Amicus Curiae. Federal Labor Relations Authority, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, D.C. United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, Respondents/cross-Petitioners, American Federation of Government Employees (Afge), Intervenor. Federal Labor Relations Authority, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. Department of Interior, Respondent/cross-Petitioner. Federal Labor Relations Authority, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. United States Department of the Air Force, Tactical Air Command, 27th Combat Support Group (Tac), Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico, Respondent/cross-Petitioner. Federal Labor Relations Authority, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. Federal Aviation Administration, Aviation Standards National Field Office, Aircraft and Engineering Division, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.