Legal Opinion

Kuchel v. Wells Fargo Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1950No. Civ. No. 14411PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

The ease is one of statutory construction. The issue is the interpretation of section 13842 of the Revenue and Taxation Code exempting from state inheritance tax property transferred to local and foreign charitable institutions. The appeal is heard on an agreed statement.

Josephine Bendheim died testate on June 13, 1947, a resident of Santa Ciará County. Her will contained among other provisions the following: “Thirteenth: I give, devise and bequeath unto Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co., two-ninths (2/9ths) of the said rest, residue and remainder of any and all property of which I may die…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crocker v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Estate of BarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Kuchel v. First Trust & Savings Bank of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Estate of FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Kuchel v. McIntoshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of BendheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API