Legal Opinion
State v. Peele
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided February 6, 1989No. 22960PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
Appellant was convicted in magistrate’s court of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquors. The Circuit Court affirmed his conviction. We affirm the rulings of the magistrate and circuit court judge.
FACTS
On November 16, 1985, appellant was arrested and charged with driving under the influence of intoxicating liquors. Prior to arresting appellant and reading him his Miranda 1 rights, the arresting officer required appellant to perform a series of “field sobriety” tests. These tests consisted of several physical maneuvers including touching his nose with his…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. BruderSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commonwealth v. BrennanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. BensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. KerrCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- State v. EaslerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- State v. SilverSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- State v. SalisburyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- State v. CluteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.