Legal Opinion

Lariccia v. Mahoning County Board of Commissioners

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1974No. 73-691PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant asks us to examine the scope of the discretion to be exercised by a board of county commissioners in considering a petition for the annexation of real property to an adjacent municipal corporation. For reasons set forth below, we conclude that the resolution-adopted by the appellant board on November 14, 1972, denying appellees’ petition, was an improper exercise of its discretion based upon the record before it, and we affrm the judgment of the Court of Appeals which reversed the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas and ordered that the petition be granted.

*101The procedure by which…

2Cited by31 opinions

  1. Smith v. Granville Township Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. City of Middletown v. McGeeOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Cincinnati Milacron, Inc. v. DoughmanOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Miami Township Board of Trustees v. CatonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Smith v. Granville Twp. Bd. of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API