Cincinnati Milacron, Inc. v. Doughman
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
The first issue before the court is whether R.C. Chapter 2506 is a potential remedy for persons who challenge the annexation of property to another jurisdiction by a board of county commissioners which has acted upon *590a landowners’ petition. Another issue before the court is whether a reviewing court pursuant to R.C. 709.07 may “sever” or “excise” territory from an approved annexation petition. For the reasons that follow, we answer both queries in the negative.
I
Statutory Scheme for Annexation on Application of Landowners
In the present case a group of landowners sought to have their territory…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Middletown v. McGeeOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Lariccia v. Mahoning County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Cincinnati v. Thomas Soft Ice Cream, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Weber v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
- Eaton v. Board of County Commrs. of Summit CountyOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Summerville v. City of Forest ParkOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Stevens v. AckmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- West v. Bode (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State ex rel. Butler Township Board of Trustees v. Montgomery County Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Board of Trustees v. for Incorporation of Holiday CityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.