Legal Opinion
State v. Catanese
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided June 23, 1980No. 66379PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
385 So.2d 235 (1980)
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Joe A. CATANESE.
No. 66379.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
June 23, 1980.
Daniel LaGrone, Smith & LaGrone, Wellborn Jack, Jr., Shreveport, for defendant-appellant.
William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Paul Carmouche, Dist. Atty., B. Woodrow Nesbitt, Ronald R. Inderbitzin, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-appellee.
DENNIS, Justice.
In this criminal case we are called upon to decide whether a defendant who knowingly and intelligently waived his right to a jury trial may thereafter have his right reinstated. We hold that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. CataneseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Thomas v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- People v. MeltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Staten v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- State v. KavanaughSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HenniganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- State v. BissettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- State v. GibsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- State v. CloudCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.