Legal Opinion

Staten v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 18, 1971No. 211, September Term, 1971PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.

Judgments entered in the Criminal Court of Baltimore against James David Staten, Jr. upon convictions under four indictments jointly tried are reversed because he was denied a jury trial.

Amendment VI to the Constitution of the United States guarantees “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed * * The history of the development of trial by jury in criminal cases reveals “a long tradition attaching great importance to the concept of relying on a body…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mathias v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Thomas v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  5. Green v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API