Legal Opinion · Dissent

Peek v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 28, 1999No. 97C-12445; CA A100853Published

1DissentDeits, C. J.

In our decision in Weidner v. Armenakis, 154 Or App 12, 959 P2d 623 (1998), withdrawn by order July 13, 1998, *270reasoning reaffirmed and readopted in Merrill v. Johnson, 155 Or App 295, 964 P2d 284, rev den 328 Or 40 (1998), we concluded, after considering the text and context of ORS 144.125(3) (1991), that it was the intent of the legislature in adopting that statute that the decision as to whether a plaintiff suffers from a severe emotional disturbance such as to present a danger to the health and safety of the community ultimately is a legal determination to be made by the Board. Weidner,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Weidner v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Merrill v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Maulding v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Mendieta v. STATE, DIVISION OF STATE LANDSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API