Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Nash

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal, from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Elliott Anthony, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

The only errors assigned in this case are such as call in question the rulings of the Superior Court upon the appellant’s motion for a continuance. The action is assumpsit, brought by the appellee upon a promissory note, executed by the appellant, payable to her own order and by her endorsed in blank, the declaration consisting of a special count on said note and the common counts, and the plea being non assumpsit.

It is claimed that, prior to the trial, the cause had been placed on the short cause calendar, but the record furnishes-no evidence of that fact, beyond what appears in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jarvis v. ShacklockIllinois Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mersick v. AldermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  2. Brown v. BrownCity of New York Municipal Court · 1915
  3. John S. Metcalf Co. v. NystedtIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Bunn v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
  5. Second National Bank of Saginaw v. ClaneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API