Legal Opinion

United States v. Breen

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided March 30, 1981No. Misc. Docket No. 81-4PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS.

GLADIS, Judge:

The United States has petitioned this Court to issue an order overturning the respondent military judge’s ruling in the special court-martial case of United States v. Honeycutt, which the Government characterizes as a finding that Rule 313 of the Military Rules of Evidence (MRE) is unconstitutional. Noting that the respondent did not declare Rule 313 to be unconstitutional and finding no grounds for extraordinary relief in this case, we deny the petition.

More than five pounds of marijuana were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dettinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. United States v. ReddingU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
  3. United States v. DillardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. PereiraU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  2. United States v. WholleyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. MitchellU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API