Legal Opinion · Dissent

DecisionQuest, Inc. v. Hayes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 2, 2003No. 1011391Published

1DissentSee, Justice

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s affirmance without opinion of the trial court’s dismissal of DecisionQuest, Inc.’s, action against Robert B. Roden, Robert J. Hayes, and Huel M. Carter on theories of breach of contract, account stated, and quantum meruit.

DecisionQuest, Inc. (“DQ”), is a trial consulting firm specializing in jury research and trial-defense strategy development. A subsidiary, DQ2™, produces trial exhibits. DQ, a California corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Dames & More, Inc., and operates offices in Los Angeles, Houston, New York, Boston, Chicago,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Wilma Corp. v. Fleming Foods of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API