People v. Eglar
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The defendant appeals his conviction of indecent exposure of his person. MCLA § 750.335a (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.567[1]).
Two girls, aged 11 and 12, testified that they were walking on a public sidewalk and that they saw the defendant across the street in a garage take down his pants and expose himself to them. The girls claim the defendant repeated this act the fol lowing day when the girls again were walking on the sidewalk.
The ease was tried by a judge without a jury. It appears that the judge had difficulty determining whether the girls were in a position to actually see into the garage.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. HarveyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. DegraffenreidMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. RedfernMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. HannaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Vanden Bosch v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.