Legal Opinion

State v. Steidley

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 8, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Lee District Court.— Hon. H. Bank, Jr., Judge. The defeudaut was. convicted of a felony and appeals from an order denying him a transcript of the shorthand notes at the expense of the county. —

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.

appealable orders. The State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order is not an appealable one, and the motion was submitted with the case. In State v. Wright, 111 Iowa, 621, we expressly held that an appeal would lie from an order denying the defendant a transcript at the expense of the county, and we are not inclined to overrule that case, notwithstanding the insistence of the State that it was erroneously decided. The motion to dismiss the appeal must therefore be overruled.

g Same- right at county’s^ expense. To authorize the judge of the trial court to order a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. State v. WaddleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GoodsellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. State v. ShafferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. State v. HortonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  5. State v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API