Legal Opinion
Dunn v. MacDonald
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 25, 1929PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The complaint in this action alleges, in effect, that on February 7th, 1928, the plaintiff’s decedent, Catherine 0. Barmmer of Bridgeport, was a passenger in an automobile driven by her husband upon the State trunk line highway between Beacon Falls and Naugatuck, and near midnight, when about half a mile south of Naugatuck Center, the automobile went through an aperture in the fence, over and down an embankment into the Naugatuck River, causing the death of the decedent by drowning; that this highway was under the care, control and supervision of the defendant State highway commissioner, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Perrotti v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Mezzi v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Upton v. Town of WindhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Lovejoy v. IsbellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Horton v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McManus v. JarvisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Ormsby v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Porpora v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- McIntosh v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Mason Ex Rel. Mason v. Hillsdale Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.