Pero v. Collier-Latimer, Inc.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Riner, Justice.
This case arose under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Wyoming and the facts involved are not in dispute. They may be stated thus:
Claimant, Leonard J. Pero, some time in March or April, 1931, commenced work for Collier-Latimer, Inc., the employer, as an attendant on a rock crushing machine which was used to supply crushed rock for a highway construction job located some three miles east of Laramie, Wyoming. At that time, so his testimony is, he was in excellent health, about twenty-one or twenty-two years of age, and had shortly before been married.
Pero’s duties as employee…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Victory Sparkler & Specialty Co. v. FrancksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Beaver v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
- In Re LarsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Maggelet's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Dove v. Alpena Hide & Leather Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bowman v. Twin Falls Const. Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Brown v. St. Joseph Lead Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Associated Seed Growers, Inc. v. ScroghamWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
- Mitchell v. VondraWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
- Fuhs v. SwensonWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.