Legal Opinion

Critzer v. Kerlin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 5, 1957No. 17302PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Justice.

This action was instituted by Mary Elizabeth Critzer, a minor, approximately three years of age, by and through her guardian ad litem, against Thomas W. Kerlin, Jr., the owner and driver of the automobile involved, to recover damages, actual and punitive, for injuries sustained as a result of a collision between the automobile operated by appellant and the minor respondent. The collision occurred on the afternoon of March 25, 1956 on Superior Street, in the City of Columbia, South Carolina. The trial resulted in a verdict for the respondent for actual damages.

At appropriate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. Perry v. Carolina TheatreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  3. Cannon v. MOTORS INS. CORP.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
  4. Fagan v. TimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  5. Carroll v. LumpkinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Padgett v. Colonial Wholesale Distributing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  2. Green v. BolenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  3. Gunnels v. RoachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  4. Williams v. FordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  5. Herring v. BoydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API