Legal Opinion

Commercial Investment Trust v. Lundgren-Wittensten Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 2, 1927No. 26,276PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Plaintiff appealed from an order denying, its motion for a new trial. The action is in replevin, but the controversy relates to whether a draft was received and retained by plaintiff under such circumstances as to constitute payment.

Defendant owed plaintiff the sum of $1,044.25, secured by certain Star motor vehicles, and an item of $25 termed “attorney’s fees.” On October 20, 1925, at the. instance of defendant, the Warren National Bank of Warren, Minnesota, issued its draft on the First National Bank of Minneapolis for $576.85 to Olson & Hage, who indorsed it in blank (their connection with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Bank of Commerce v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. BargabosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Dalrymple v. Randall, Gee & Mitchell Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Peterson v. School District No. 14Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alexiou v. Bridgeport-Peoples' Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  2. Gustafson v. Equitable Loan Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. First National Bank v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Pohl v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Guckeen Farmers Elevator Co. v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API