Legal Opinion

Brown v. City of Memphis

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided February 5, 2013No. Case No. 05-02419PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge.

While on their way to purchase crack cocaine, Plaintiffs Reginald Brown and Nicholas Biles were robbed and falsely imprisoned by Defendant Arthur Sease IV, who at the time was an off-duty Memphis police officer. Plaintiffs allege civil rights violations and tort law claims against Defendants Sease and the City of Memphis. The City of Memphis moves for summary judgment on all counts. The motion has been fully briefed, and a hearing is unnecessary. For the following reasons, the court will grant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Harold (In re Harold)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  2. Shapiro v. WoodberryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  3. Vara v. WoodberryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API