Legal Opinion

People v. Kindell

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1969No. Docket 6,131PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant pled guilty to uttering and publishing a forged cheek 1 and was sentenced to 10 to 14 years’ imprisonment. He appeals, asserting that his plea was induced hy charge and sentence concessions promised hy the prosecutor.

The claim that his plea was induced hy a promise that another charge pending against him would not be prosecuted is supported in the record. 2 However, no claim is made that the promise not to prosecute that charge was not fulfilled. A fulfilled promise of charge reduction is not a ground for vacating a guilty plea even if the plea was induced thereby. People v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BartlettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. ByrdMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. People v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. People v. DickersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. ScruggsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. GoinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. BooneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. People v. SumlinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. People v. BainesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. People v. WrightMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API