People v. Scruggs
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
Defendant appeals his guilty plea conviction of statutory rape. We have examined the colloquy between the defendant and the circuit judge at the arraignment on the information and at the time of sentencing. The requirements of GCR 1963, 785.3(2) and CL 1948, § 768.35 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.1058), as interpreted in People v. Dunn (1968), 380 Mich 693, were complied with before acceptance of the plea and sentencing.
Nine months after sentencing, the defendant submitted an affidavit stating: “Later he [the defendant] was advised by the probation office that he would receive probation.” The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. DunnMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. BartlettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. KindellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. DickersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. BooneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. KinsmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.