Legal Opinion
United States v. Carlos M. Solis
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 27, 1997No. 96-1544PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
This is a successive appeal to United States v. Jerez, 108 F.3d 684 (7th Cir.1997), which we decide simultaneously. Familiarity with that opinion is assumed. Mr. Solis filed this appeal from the district court’s denial of his motion, filed pursuant to Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, requesting the return to his possession of certain personal property, including his automobile, seized at the time of his arrest. As the case comes to us, the only contention that is presented properly is that the automobile was taken wrongfully because its taking…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Lenin M. Jerez and Carlos M. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Luis Mora v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Wayne L. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Charles William WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Ralphael Okoro v. William CallaghanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. OguajuCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Ralphael Okoro v. Randall BohmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Ceverilo ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.