Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Grabenhofer v. Garrett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 19, 1963No. 741PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

The properties and incidents of an estate by the entirety are set forth in Davis v. Bass, 188 N.C. 200, 124 S.E. 566, and in Johnson v. Leavitt, 188 N.C. 682, 125 S.E. 490. For a comprehensive exposition, with full citations, see valuable article by Professor Robert E. Lee, “Tenancy by the Entirety in North Carolina,” 41 N.C.L.R. 67-100.

Under prior decisions of this Court, defendant has no (divisible) interest in the subj ect property which, during coverture, is subj ect to sale under judgment and execution against him alone. Edwards v. Arnold, 250 N.C. 500, 109 S.E. 2d 205; Harris v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Johnson v. . LeavittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. GENERAL AIR CONDITIONING COMPANY v. DouglassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Hood v. . MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Lewis v. . PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. L & M GAS COMPANY v. LeggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Matter of GeogheganUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1989
  3. In Re KnappUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2002
  4. In Re ChandlerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1992
  5. In Re CrouchUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API