Legal Opinion
United States v. Olin Corp.
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided May 20, 1996No. Civil Action 95-0526-BH-SPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAND, Senior District Judge.
The United States filed this action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601, et seq., against defendant Olin Corporation (“Olin”), a Virginia corporation which owns and operates a chemical plant in McIntosh, Alabama, in southwest Washington County, approximately 25 miles east of the Mississippi state line and 75 miles north of the Gulf of Mexico. With the complaint, the parties filed a proposed consent degree. This court requested the parties to brief certain statutory and constitutional…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Usa, Acting at Request of the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (Epa) v. Olin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Nathan Wall (95-5007) and Donald Wall (95-5008)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Raytheon Co. v. McGraw-Edison Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1997
- Building Industry Association of Superior California v. BabbittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- United States v. LightmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.