Crosby v. Stage Stores, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion for Corrective Notice. (Doc. No. 89.) Stage Stores, Inc. ("Stage") has responded in opposition, to which Plaintiffs have replied. (Doc. Nos. 105, 115.) For the reasons set out below, Plaintiffs' Motion for Corrective Notice will be denied.
I. Factual Background
Plaintiffs initially sought certification of a collective class, pursuant to the Fair *885Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), consisting of all past and present employees of Stage who held various associate-level positions…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In Re General Motors Corporation Engine Interchange LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Kleiner v. First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Belt v. Emcare, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barriga v. 99 Cents Only Stores LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Barriga v. 99 Cents Only Stores LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Cowan v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Kordie v. Ohio LivingDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022