Legal Opinion
Kordie v. Ohio Living
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 9, 2022No. 2:21-cv-03791Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION NICOLE KORDIE, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, et al., : CASE NO.: 21cv-3791 Plaintiffs, : JUDGE SARAH MORRISON v. : MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHELSEY VASCURA OHIO LIVING, et al., : Defendants. OPINION & ORDER Plaintiff Nicole Kordie’s “Emergency Motion for a Corrective Notice, Reopening/Extending the Opt-In Period, and Immediate Protective Order, Attorneys’ Fees Relating to this Motion, and Immediate Production of Declaration(s) and Communications” (ECF No. 31) brings this matter to the Court’s attention.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- First Bank of Marietta, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.