Legal Opinion

Howell v. Willamette Urology, P.C.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 2008No. CC 0701-01084; SC S055099PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

This mandamus proceeding arises out of a dispute over the proper venue for a wrongful death action. Venue for a wrongful death action is governed by ORS 14.080, which provides, in part:

“(1) All other actions [including actions for wrongful death] shall be commenced in the county in which the defendants, or one of them, reside at the commencement of the action or in the county where the cause of action[ 1 ] arose. A party resident of more than one county shall be deemed a resident of each such county. If none of the defendants reside in this state the action may be commenced in any county.
“(2)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State Ex Rel. Kleinsorge v. ReidOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State Ex Rel. Industrial Supply Co. v. GoldsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martineau v. McKenzie-Willamette Medical CenterOregon Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Allen v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  3. Logan v. Waterford Operations, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. Hughes v. PeaceHealthOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Hughes v. PeaceHealthOregon Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API