Legal Opinion
Howell v. Willamette Urology, P.C.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 14, 2008No. CC 0701-01084; SC S055099PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
This mandamus proceeding arises out of a dispute over the proper venue for a wrongful death action. Venue for a wrongful death action is governed by ORS 14.080, which provides, in part:
“(1) All other actions [including actions for wrongful death] shall be commenced in the county in which the defendants, or one of them, reside at the commencement of the action or in the county where the cause of action[ 1 ] arose. A party resident of more than one county shall be deemed a resident of each such county. If none of the defendants reside in this state the action may be commenced in any county.
“(2)…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- MacK Trucks, Inc. v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Kleinsorge v. ReidOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- State Ex Rel. Industrial Supply Co. v. GoldsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by6 opinions
- Martineau v. McKenzie-Willamette Medical CenterOregon Supreme Court · 2023
- Allen v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- Logan v. Waterford Operations, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Hughes v. PeaceHealthOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- Hughes v. PeaceHealthOregon Supreme Court · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.