Baker v. Brundage
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action for specific performance in the district court for Crow Wing county. Henry Spalding filed a complaint in intervention and asked for a decree that neither plaintiffs nor defendants had any right, title or interest in the premises described. The case was trieil before Wright, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of intervener. From the order denying his motion for amended findings or for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
The defendants are husband and wife, and the wife was the owner of a tract of land in Crow Wing county in this state encumbered by two mortgages. One of the mortgages had been foreclosed, and the *300time to redeem from the foreclosure sale would expire on March 2, 1915. In September, 1914, negotiations were entered into between the husband and J. M. Quinn, a real estate agent at Brainerd, for the sale of the land by Quinn subject to the mortgage claims. On February 10, 1915, defendants sold the land to one Welchel, and he thereafter sold it to the intervener Spalding. On February 30,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. BadgerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Larson v. O'HaraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Van Brunt v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Betcher v. RinehartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- John Gund Brewing Co. v. TourtelotteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shank v. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Westfall v. EllisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Georgacopulos v. HrubyIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Bergh v. StanekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921