Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Baton Rouge Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 1, 1964No. 6147PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANDRY, Judge.
Plaintiff, Denzil R. Murphy, has taken this appeal from the decree of the trial court granting him judgment in the sum of $563.45 in recompense of medical expense incurred but rejecting his claim for workmen’s compensation benefits allegedly due because of total and permanent disability reputedly sustained in a fall which plaintiff experienced March 19, 1962, in the course of his employment by defendant, Baton Rouge Coca-Cola Bottling Company, Ltd. Neither defendant-employer nor its compensation insurer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, have appealed or answered this appeal.
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brannon v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Carlino v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Reed v. Calcasieu Paper CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- Daigle v. Higgins IndustriesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
- Thomas v. Gates, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Basco v. State of La., Dept. of CorrectionsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Lavergne v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Bustillo v. Boudreaux & Dane Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Monarch Rubber Co. v. WeinsteinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Murphy v. Baton Rouge Coca Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1964