People v. V.S.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Quetsch
The State indicted defendant, V.S., for criminal sexual assault and aggravated criminal sexual abuse (111. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, pars. 12 — 13(a)(3), 12 — 16(b)). Defendant brought a motion to suppress his statements, alleging that the investigators had not read him the Miranda warnings prior to their interview with him. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to suppress, and the State appeals. The issue on appeal is whether the investigators were obliged to read the Miranda warnings because defendant was the focus of their investigation.
Joyce Rizzo testified that she was a criminal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Orozco v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. RipplingerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- People v. SchoeningAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- People v. RipplingerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000