Charleston Capital Corp. v. Love Valley Enterprises, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
The first question to be decided on this appeal is whether Judge Martin had the power and authority to hear plaintiff appellee’s motion for summary judgment while defendant’s motion for change of venue was pending. A very similar factual situation is found in Roberts v. Moore, 185 N.C. 254, 116 S.E. 728. In that case, plaintiff was a foreign corporation and defendants were citizens of Sampson County. Suit was filed in New Hanover County and summons issued. Before time for answering the complaint had expired, defendants moved for a change of venue to Sampson County. A notice of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Roberts & Hoge, Inc. v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. ThrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hoglen v. JamesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Little v. LittleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Hogue v. HogueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016