Borchert v. Hecla Mining Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment issued in favor of defendants-respondents in an action filed by plaintiff Borchert alleging forfeiture of a real estate sales contract without adequate notice or opportunity to cure the default, and conspiracy to forfeit Borchert’s interest in the real property. We affirm.
The facts are uncontroverted. In 1968, Borchert’s husband was an employee of Hecla Mining Company, and he entered into a real estate contract to purchase, interest free, a residential property. The purchase price was $5,600, payable at the rate of $70 monthly, and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Durant v. SnyderIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
- JR Simplot Company v. ChambersIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
- Prairie Development Co. v. LeibergIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Rush v. AnestosIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Papesh v. WagnonIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.