Legal Opinion
Torres-Hicks v. Connecticut Housing Finance Authority
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 5, 2008No. Civil 3:06CV01379(AWT)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Glenda Torres-Hieks (“Torres-Hicks”), brought this action against defendants Connecticut Housing Finance Authority (“CHFA”), Linda Igle-sias (“Iglesias”), Wyolene Fitzpatrick Has-lam (“Haslam”), Timothy Coppage (“Cop-page”), and Gary King (“King”). The plaintiff claims that the defendants unlawfully terminated her employment based on her age, gender, and race. Defendants CHFA, Coppage, and King have moved for summary judgment on the Second, Third, and Fourth Counts (§ 1983 Due Process and Equal Protection…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Liu v. MinchellaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Ortiz Salgado v. University of Connecticut Health CenterDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024