Bendish v. Castillo
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Cendak Development Corporation and Fort Rice Bar & Grill, Inc. (“Cen-dak”), appeal from a judgment entered in favor of Richard and Mary Bendish, canceling Bendishes’ contract for deed with James Castillo and holding Cendak had no right to redeem the property under a lease purchase agreement. We affirm, concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion in not granting Cendak a right to redeem the property.
I
[¶ 2] This is an action to cancel a contract for deed. In 2003, Bendishes owned land in Fort Rice, North Dakota, where they operated a business called the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. KinseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- National Bank of Harvey v. International Harvester Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Johnson v. HovlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Johnson v. HovlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Bender v. LiebeltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bakken v. DuchscherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Blasi v. Bruin E&P PartnersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Johnson v. MarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Hillerson v. Bismarck Public SchoolsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- In re Racing Servs., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.