Walker v. Walker
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Thomson, J., Spartanburg, October, 1879. In this case Hon. T. B. Fraser, Judge of tbe Third Circuit, sat in the place of the Chief Justice, who had been of counsel.
Read the full summary
Before Thomson, J., Spartanburg, October, 1879. In this case Hon. T. B. Fraser, Judge of tbe Third Circuit, sat in the place of the Chief Justice, who had been of counsel. Action by Joseph Walker against William H. Walker and Mary E. Walker, commenced May 25, 18J5. The circuit decree, after a statement of the facts (which sufficiently appear in the opinion of this court) was as follows: The Court will not take up the exceptions in succession, but will state in connection the views of facts and law which govern the case. As a fact, the jury (from the papers before me), did not find upon the…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Me. Justice Feasee.
On examining the admitted facts and the evidence contained in the “ Case ” before this Court, it appears that this appellant, Mary E. Walker, was seized of the tract of land described in the complaint in this case; that by proper conveyances the land was conveyed to A. W. Cum*334mings as security for a debt due to him; that when this debt was paid, except the sum of $49.00, by consent of Mary E. Walker, Cummings conveyed the land to Joseph Walker & •Co., a firm consisting of Joseph Walker, the plaintiff, and J. G-. Goodlett (the…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Bethea v. Beaufort County Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1918