Legal Opinion

Barre-National, Inc. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 10, 1991No. Civ. A. 91-3214PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOLIN, District Judge.

Before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, pursuant to Federal Rule 65, to restrain defendant from distributing liquid pharmaceuticals using defendant’s own trademark. In accordance with Federal Rule 52, the Court sets forth herein its findings of fact and conclusions of law. For the reasons expressed below, the Court will deny plaintiff’s motion.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

A. Barre-National and Barr Laboratories

Plaintiff Barre-National, Inc. (“Barre”) 1 , a corporation formed in 1949, 2 is engaged in the manufacture, distribution and sale of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

McGregor-Doniger Inc. v. Drizzle Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
Opticians Ass'n of America v. Independent Opticians of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
Scott Paper Company, a Corporation v. Scott's Liquid Gold, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
Pignons S. A. De Mecanique De Precision v. Polaroid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
Interpace Corporation v. Lapp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

A&h Sportswear, Inc Mainstream Swimsuits, Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc. Victoria's Secret Catalogue, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
Checkpoint Systems, Inc. v. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
Bose Corporation v. EjazCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
A & H Sportswear Inc. Mainstream Swimsuits, Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc. Victoria's Secret Catalogue, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
Pharmacia Corp. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.