Legal Opinion

Inhabitants of Raritan v. Port Reading Railroad

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On order to show cause why injunction shall not issue.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The defendant railroad company is erecting, in the public highway known as Smith road, two abutments, twenty-five feet apart and about seventy-five long and six feet wide, upon which it proposes to erect a bridge, over the highway, for its railroad. At the point where the bridge is to be erected the entire width of the road is fifty feet, and the part in actual use by vehicles is about twelve feet wide. It is not even pretended that, to enable the defendant to bridge the highway, it is necessary to place the abutments in the road. On the contrary, it plainly appears that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The People v. . N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kugler v. RomainNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  2. Gillespie County v. Fredericksburg Land Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. State v. JenningsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API